Take the Assessment

Framework Crosswalks

See how MBTI, Big Five, Enneagram, DISC, and other personality frameworks map to Icosa's 20-center structural model.

Framework Types Capture Rate Capacities Domains Coherence Traps Gateways
Big Five (OCEAN) 10 87% 90% 70% 60% 20% 10%
DISC 12 82% 85% 45% 40% 15% 10%
Four Temperaments 4 82% 80% 52% 40% 15% 10%
Holland Codes (RIASEC) 126 80% 60% 80% 30% 10% 5%
Attachment Styles (Bowlby/Ainsworth) 4 78% 85% 70% 80% 75% 40%
Enneagram 54 75% 80% 60% 50% 40% 20%
Type A/B/C/D 4 75% 70% 35% 50% 20% 10%
MBTI 24 65% 70% 55% 30% 10% 5%
Confidence Bands
Strong (≥70%) — Framework reliably represents this dimension Moderate (40-69%) — Partial overlap, some information preserved Weak (20-39%) — Minimal coverage, significant information loss Speculative (<20%) — Dimension effectively unmapped

Most personality tests measure a partial view of who you are. The Big Five captures five factors. The MBTI sorts you into one of sixteen types. The Enneagram gives you a number from one to nine. Each is useful — but each is incomplete.

Icosa measures 20 structural centers across four capacities and five domains. Principal component analysis shows that 19 of 20 components are needed to explain 95% of variance in real assessment data. Translating that richness into a five-factor model means losing roughly 75% of the structural information.

The confidence scores below represent each framework's ability to represent the Icosa model's richer structural detail. A higher score means less information is lost in translation.

See how your actual profile compares to what simpler frameworks can capture.

Take the Assessment →