Live Beta

Icosa is in live beta

Icosa is a holistic personality framework — not medical software. It does not diagnose, prescribe, or observe behavior. Each result describes only what a person’s structure currently supports: the building and the floor plan, not what happens inside. This beta is for practitioners, clinicians, and early‑adopter explorers, not for general clinical use.

The instrument has been rigorously validated against clinical standards, but the system is brand‑new and only beginning real‑world use. Final measurements, terms, and features stabilize by Summer 2026; the public release will be greatly simplified and built for safe, general use.

During this beta, HIPAA, GDPR, privacy policies, terms of service, and data stability are not enforced — everything is changing rapidly as the platform improves toward launch.

Thank you for being part of this new model and community.

Compare

Different maps, same territory

Modern crosswalks, ancient systems, and honest comparisons about what each model sees clearly and where it stops.

Crosswalks

Modern Frameworks

Crosswalks to frameworks people already use in coaching, therapy, hiring, and self-description.

Compare

Big Five

The Big Five describes five trait dimensions discovered through factor analysis of natural language descriptors. Icosa describes 20 measurable centers organ…

Compare
Compare

DISC

DISC organizes behavior along two axes — task vs. people, active vs. passive — and produces four clean styles. Icosa describes the same person across 20 cen…

Compare
Compare

Four Temperaments

The Four Temperaments — Sanguine, Choleric, Melancholic, Phlegmatic — are the oldest formal personality classification in recorded history. Icosa describes…

Compare
Compare

Holland Codes

Holland's RIASEC model sorts people into six vocational orientations arranged hexagonally. Icosa describes the same person across 20 centers organized into…

Compare
Compare

Enneagram

The Enneagram describes nine motivational structures and the fixations they generate. Icosa describes 20 measurable centers and the traps that form between…

Compare
Compare

Type A/B/C/D

Type A/B/C/D originated in cardiology, not psychology — four behavioral profiles linked to specific health outcomes. Icosa describes the same person across…

Compare
Compare

MBTI

MBTI sorts people into 16 categorical types from four binary dichotomies. Icosa measures continuous state across 20 centers. The two systems are complementa…

Compare
Compare

Attachment Styles

Attachment theory describes four relational strategies for regulating closeness, fear, and vulnerability. Icosa describes the same person across 20 centers…

Compare
Symbolic

Ancient Systems

Long-form comparisons with older symbolic, philosophical, and cosmological maps of the inner life.

Symbolic

Alchemy

Both alchemy and the Icosa personality system attempt to map the structure of the inner life, model how that structure becomes disordered, and chart a path…

Compare
Symbolic

Astrology

Three of four element-capacity correspondences hold under structural scrutiny. The modality-state mapping fails. The deepest difference between the systems…

Compare
Symbolic

Chakras

The structural correspondence between chakras and Icosa harmony centers is the most contested mapping in the Ancient Maps series. The disagreement about whe…

Compare
Symbolic

Ancient Enneagram

The esoteric Enneagram describes nine motivational structures and the fixations they generate. Icosa describes 20 measurable centers and 80 traps. The deepe…

Compare
Symbolic

I Ching

Both the I Ching and the Icosa generate their vocabularies by crossing independent dimensions in a grid. This 12,000-word investigation traces where two sys…

Compare
Symbolic

Ifa

Both systems are combinatorial grammars that generate meaning through the crossing of fundamental elements, diagnose specific configurations, and prescribe…

Compare
Symbolic

Kabbalah

The Kabbalistic Tree of Life and the Icosa grid share a set of structural intuitions specific enough that coincidence becomes unsatisfying: both identify th…

Compare
Symbolic

Ma'at

The Egyptian Book of the Dead lists forty-two moral confessions recited before forty-two divine judges. The Icosa system names eighty self-reinforcing struc…

Compare
Symbolic

Tarot

Two systems, separated by six centuries, attempt to map the human psyche. One emerged from Renaissance card games and esoteric tradition. The other from geo…

Compare
Symbolic

Wu Xing

Chinese Five Phases (Wu Xing) and the Icosa grid both divide human experience into five territories, track disharmonious feedback loops, and model health as…

Compare