Formations
Seventy-seven named profile shapes that clinicians recognize instantly
Your profile contains twenty centers, dozens of individual findings, traps, basins, gateways, dynamics. Before interpreting any of that detail, a clinician needs to answer a prior question: what kind of structure is this? A formation is the answer. This page explains how 77 named formations arise from the grid’s geometry, what they communicate, and how they change over time.
The number 77 is not a design choice. It is a consequence of the geometry: every combinatorial position is occupied by exactly one formation, and every formation occupies exactly one position. Three classification coordinates across four non-Thriving bands (3 x 3 x 2 = 18 formations each), plus five dynamics-based formations at the Thriving band. Seventy-seven named shapes that cover the entire space of possible profiles.
What Is a Formation?
A formation reduces your entire 4x5 grid to a single named shape — the structural fingerprint of your whole system. Where patterns describe shapes within the grid and traps describe self-reinforcing cycles, a formation describes the global architecture. It is the whole-person classification, expressed as a single word.
When a clinician says “this person is Withdrawn,” they have communicated that the system is in the Struggling band with both Capacities and Domains pulled Under in a coherent pattern — a consistent, organized contraction. When they say “this person is Volatile,” they have communicated a system in the Struggling band with everything pushed Over in a scattered, incoherent pattern. One word carries the full picture.
The Four Classification Dimensions
Every formation is located by four coordinates. Together, these dimensions create a space in which all seventy-seven formations have unique positions.
1. Coherence Band — Where the system sits on the severity gradient. The five bands (Thriving, Steady, Struggling, Overwhelmed, Crisis) form concentric rings. The same directional pattern means something different at different severity levels. A system with everything pulled Under is Resting at Steady — quiet but functional. The same pattern at Crisis is Collapsed — a system that has shut down entirely.
2. Capacity Direction — Whether the four Capacities (Open, Focus, Bond, Move) are, on average, contracted (Under), balanced (Centered), or in excess (Over). This tells the clinician whether the problem is primarily one of too little or too much.
3. Domain Direction — Whether the five Domains (Physical, Emotional, Mental, Relational, Spiritual) are depleted (Under), balanced (Centered), or overwhelmed (Over). Capacity direction and Domain direction are independent: a person can have shut-down functions with overwhelmed territories, or excessive functions with depleted territories.
4. Coherence Type — Whether the off-center positions are internally consistent (Coherent) or scattered (Incoherent). A coherent formation has an organized problem with a clear shape. An incoherent formation has a disorganized problem — different parts pulled in different directions. The coherence-type boundary uses the standard deviation across all nine aggregate scores (four Capacity means and five Domain scores). When the standard deviation is less than 0.4 times the range, the profile is classified as coherent; otherwise incoherent. This threshold marks the point at which internal scatter becomes large enough to disrupt the directional signal.
How the 77 Formations Arise
For the four non-Thriving bands, each formation is located by three coordinates: Capacity direction (3 options), Domain direction (3 options), and coherence type (2 options). That gives 3 x 3 x 2 = 18 formations per band. Across four bands: 72 formations.
At the Thriving band, where centers cluster near their harmony points, directional labels lose meaning. What distinguishes one Thriving person from another is how the system is moving. Five dynamics-based formations replace the directional grid.
| Band | Classification Basis | Count |
|---|---|---|
| Thriving | Dynamics (how the system moves) | 5 |
| Steady | Direction x Coherence type | 18 |
| Struggling | Direction x Coherence type | 18 |
| Overwhelmed | Direction x Coherence type | 18 |
| Crisis | Direction x Coherence type | 18 |
| Total | 77 |
The Five Thriving Formations
At the Thriving band (coherence 80+), centers are near their harmony points. Five dynamics-based formations capture the distinct ways a healthy system can be organized:
- Balanced — Near center with stable dynamics. Equilibrium: a system at rest in a good position.
- Anchored — Near center with elevated vitality. Energy high, engagement strong, actively sustaining health through robust activity.
- Emerging — Near center and gaining ground. Coherence rising, trajectory upward. A growth phase building on an already healthy foundation.
- Drifting — Near center but losing ground. Coherence declining, trajectory downward. Something is eroding: a gateway closing, a Domain depleting.
- Stalled — Near center with no momentum. Neither gaining nor losing, but not dynamically engaged.
Formation Examples Across Bands
Withdrawn (Struggling — Under / Under / Coherent)
Both functions and territories consistently pulled below center in an organized way. Everything is quieter, smaller, less present. Unlike Resting (its Steady counterpart), Withdrawn describes contraction causing real functional impairment. The person has pulled inward uniformly, producing a stable but depleted state. The coherent pattern gives it a clear directional signature: the work is about gradual expansion.
Volatile (Struggling — Over / Over / Incoherent)
Disorganized intensification. All functions and territories pushed above center but inconsistently. The system is running hot and erratically — the person cannot predict their own responses. This is the opposite structural character from Withdrawn: instead of organized quiet, it is chaotic overflow.
Crushed (Overwhelmed — Under / Over / Coherent)
Capacities contracted while Domains run above center, held coherently. The functions that should be processing overwhelming input have gone offline — too much coming in with nothing to process it, in a self-reinforcing pattern. This is the structural signature of someone drowning in experience they cannot metabolize.
Frozen (Crisis — Centered / Centered / Coherent)
Directional averages appear balanced. The pattern looks coherent. But the coherence score is in the Crisis range. A person whose defenses maintain a centered appearance while the underlying system is failing. The coherence score detects what the directional averages mask. This formation is a reminder that severity and direction are independent dimensions.
Formation Axes
The 77 formations are organized into 18 formation axes — radial lines connecting formations that share the same shape but differ in severity. When coherence changes, the kind of structure tends to persist. A person classified as Walled at Struggling sits on the same axis as Reserved (Steady), Constrained (Overwhelmed), and Spent (Crisis).
Full Formation Axes Table
| Axis | Steady | Struggling | Overwhelmed | Crisis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under x Under x Coherent | Resting | Withdrawn | Constricted | Collapsed |
| Under x Under x Incoherent | Ebbing | Dimming | Fragmenting | Shattered |
| Under x Centered x Coherent | Reserved | Walled | Constrained | Spent |
| Under x Centered x Incoherent | Selective | Cautious | Destabilized | Severed |
| Under x Over x Coherent | Absorbing | Bracing | Crushed | Drowning |
| Under x Over x Incoherent | Adjusting | Straining | Splitting | Fractured |
| Centered x Under x Coherent | Quiet | Muted | Suppressed | Hollowed |
| Centered x Under x Incoherent | Waning | Scattered | Eroding | Corroding |
| Centered x Centered x Coherent | Poised | Holding | Suspended | Frozen |
| Centered x Centered x Incoherent | Wavering | Skewed | Oscillating | Unraveling |
| Centered x Over x Coherent | Growing | Amplified | Overloaded | Overrun |
| Centered x Over x Incoherent | Expanding | Rippling | Escalating | Torrential |
| Over x Under x Coherent | Focused | Pressured | Clenched | Rigid |
| Over x Under x Incoherent | Redirecting | Conflicted | Torn | Splintered |
| Over x Centered x Coherent | Engaged | Activated | Spiking | Unleashed |
| Over x Centered x Incoherent | Reaching | Swelling | Chaotic | Erratic |
| Over x Over x Coherent | Ascending | Intensified | Inundated | Consumed |
| Over x Over x Incoherent | Stirring | Volatile | Raging | Detonating |
Formation as Clinical Shorthand
A formation name communicates six pieces of information in a single word:
- Severity — Which coherence band the person falls in
- Functional direction — Whether Capacities are contracted, balanced, or in excess
- Territorial direction — Whether Domains are depleted, balanced, or overwhelmed
- Internal consistency — Whether the pattern is organized or fragmented
- Structural quality — The evocative character of the name itself
- Axis position — Which line the person sits on, indicating trajectory under change
This compression is the formation’s power. A clinician saying “Fortress pattern” conveys more than listing twenty individual center states. It communicates the global architecture in a way that is immediately actionable — a Withdrawn system needs gradual expansion, a Volatile system needs stabilization before anything else, a Frozen system needs the defenses honored before they can be addressed.
Formation Families
The 18 axes group into higher-order clusters based on shared properties. Capacity-led formations (Capacity direction Under or Over, Domains Centered) indicate the problem is about how the person processes experience. Domain-led formations (Domain direction Under or Over, Capacities Centered) indicate the problem is about the terrain. Dual-direction formations (both displaced) are more complex and typically more severe.
The coherence-type split is equally important. Coherent formations suggest directional work: move the consistent pattern toward center. Incoherent formations suggest organizational work first: reduce internal contradiction before attempting directional movement.
Boundary cases. Not every profile maps cleanly to a single formation. When a profile sits near dimensional boundaries, the engine provides two metrics: formation confidence (how closely the geometry matches the archetype) and formation certainty (how clearly it is distinguished from alternatives). High confidence with high certainty means a distinct classification. Low confidence with low certainty means the profile is in a convergent zone where neighboring formations are almost equally good fits. These boundary readings are clinically informative — they indicate a system in transition between structural modes.
Your Formation Is Not a Fixed Type
A formation is a snapshot, not a sentence. It describes the current shape of your system, and that shape changes as you do. A person who moves from Withdrawn to Reserved has shifted bands while the structural character held — the same axis, less severity. A person who moves from Volatile to Holding has reorganized entirely — different directions, different coherence type, a fundamentally different kind of structure.
Your formation tells you where you are right now. Your centering plan tells you where you go next. Together they provide both the diagnosis and the direction — a starting point for the work of structural change.
See this in your own profile
Take the Assessment →