Coherence

Your Icosa profile maps twenty centers across four capacities and five domains. Coherence distills that entire landscape into a single number — the most important number in your profile. This page explains what that number measures, how it is computed, and why it matters more than any individual score.

One Number, Twenty Centers

A system where ten centers thrive while ten collapse is not half-functional. The healthy half spends energy compensating for the collapsed half — routing around failures, absorbing displaced load, maintaining a surface that conceals internal fracture. Coherence reflects that strain. It penalizes fragmentation and rewards integration, producing a score from 0 to 100 that captures the whole-system picture no individual reading can.

The score places you in one of five bands — Crisis, Overwhelmed, Struggling, Steady, or Thriving — each representing a qualitatively distinct mode of functioning. The band boundaries sit where the nature of the system’s behavior shifts, not at arbitrary intervals.

Five Multiplicative Layers

Coherence is computed through five layers, each measuring a structurally distinct dimension of system health. The layers are multiplied together, which carries a fundamental consequence: weakness in any single layer drags the entire score down, regardless of how strong the other four are.

Each layer produces a value between 0 and 1. Multiply all five, scale by 100, and compress through an asymptotic ceiling, and you have the coherence score.

Why Multiplicative Matters

Consider a profile with excellent center health (GF = 0.95), perfect organization (SI = 0.98), strong vitality (SV = 0.95), and accurate self-perception (AV = 0.95). If it also carries three severe traps dragging pathology attenuation to 0.60, the coherence score collapses — because 0.95 times 0.98 times 0.95 times 0.60 times 0.95 is far below what any single layer would suggest.

This is by design. Coherence requires adequacy across all five dimensions. Each layer has a configurable floor that prevents complete zeroing — even the most pathology-burdened system retains some structural health. Every living human system has residual coherence, however strained.

The Five Bands

The coherence score places every person in one of five bands. Each represents a qualitatively distinct condition — a different mode of system functioning with different characteristics, risks, and implications.

Crisis (Below 30)

Multiple centers at extreme displacement. Multiple traps active, often at gateway positions. The system has lost the internal scaffolding to self-correct. External support — relational, professional, environmental — is a necessity, not a recommendation.

A person in structural crisis may present as flat and withdrawn rather than visibly distressed, because the system’s capacity to register distress may itself be compromised.

Overwhelmed (30 — 43)

Severely strained but retaining some scaffolding. Unlike Crisis, some centers work overtime to prevent total collapse. A teacher who shows up daily, maintains public competence, but runs on two healthy capacities carrying the entire system. One additional stressor could push the compensatory arrangement past its limits.

Struggling (44 — 64)

The widest and most clinically diverse band. Real problems and measurable impairment, but architecture intact enough to support daily functioning, relationships, and goals. A person at 63 may have one localized trap. A person at 46 may have widespread moderate displacement with multiple traps and basins. The coherence score locates severity within the band; the full profile shows the specific configuration.

Steady (65 — 79)

The majority of centers are near their harmony points. Gateways are largely functional. Traps, if present, are few — typically zero or one. Problems occur against a backdrop of broad functional integration. The system has the resources to address them.

Steady does not mean perfect. Several centers may be moderately displaced. The difference from Struggling is structural context.

Thriving (80+)

High integration across all twenty centers. Capacities flow with minimal displacement. Domains are in balanced condition. Gateways are functional. Traps are absent or negligible. The system operates as a coordinated whole.

Thriving is rare. Most profiles fall in the Struggling to Steady range. It is not the universal goal of centering work — a person moving from Crisis to Overwhelmed has achieved something profound. The bands mark conditions, not human value.

What Drives Coherence Up and Down

Proximity to center is the strongest single driver. Moving ten centers from “slightly displaced” to “near center” produces a larger coherence gain than moving one center from “severely displaced” to “slightly displaced” while leaving the other nine untouched. Breadth of health matters more than isolated excellence.

Even distribution matters. Twenty centers at moderate health produce higher coherence than a split between excellent and poor, even with the same arithmetic mean. The lopsided system spends energy on internal compensation.

Gateways carry disproportionate weight. The nine gateway centers are weighted more heavily in the Grid Foundation layer. A system with nine healthy gateways and eleven moderately displaced non-gateway centers scores substantially higher than the reverse.

Traps cost real points. Each active trap represents a locked center that cannot contribute to system health — and the damage extends beyond the locked center through cascade channels. One trap is a localized problem. Three or more create compounding cascade effects.

What Coherence Is Not

Coherence as Compass

The coherence score tells you where the system stands before any detailed reading begins. The band provides the frame.

A trap in a Steady system is a focused target for growth. That same trap in a Crisis system is part of a larger emergency. The coherence band determines which interpretation applies.

The score is most powerful as a longitudinal measure. A single score is a snapshot. Two scores show direction. Three or more show trajectory. During genuine change, coherence sometimes dips before it rises — a temporary valley as the system dismantles a compensatory arrangement and exposes the raw displacement underneath. That valley is a feature of growth, not a sign of failure. The system passes through difficulty on the way to deeper integration.

Coherence tells you how much structural integration is present. The full Atlas tells you where integration is strong, where it is failing, which patterns are active, which gateways are compromised, and what dynamics are in motion. Coherence without the Atlas is a compass without a map. The Atlas without coherence is a map without a scale. Together, they give you the complete picture of where you are and what to do next.