Take the Assessment

Learn & Explore

Understand the science behind the Icosa, explore research insights, and deepen your self-knowledge.

Icosa Insights

Icosa Insights 17 min

Applied Validation: Intervention Planning, Relationship Dynamics, and Cross-Framework Translation

What can you actually do with the results? This research tests the practical utility of centering plans, relationship dynamics mapping, and cross-framework translation in applied settings. Gateway-based centering plans predict completion and improvement, dyadic interaction types forecast relationship coherence, and translating results into other frameworks preserves clinically useful signal — confirming the model’s value extends beyond assessment into actionable guidance.

researchvalidation-applied
Icosa Insights 16 min

Clinical Translation: From Profile Structure to Clinical Utility

Can clinicians trust what the model tells them about their clients? This research tests whether grid geometry captures recognized clinical phenotypes, finding meaningful convergence between structural patterns and established diagnostic categories. The safety screen aligns with independent risk indicators, and cross-capacity spread predicts worse clinical outcomes — giving clinicians structural evidence that complements their professional judgment.

researchvalidation-clinical
Icosa Insights 16 min

Convergent Validity: Does the Icosa Model Measure What Established Frameworks Measure?

Does the Icosa measure something real, or just something novel? This research tests convergent and discriminant validity against established instruments, finding that coherence behaves like a clinical outcome measure and profile types show meaningful stability over time. The twenty-dimension grid captures information beyond what simpler frameworks provide, confirming genuine explanatory value rather than redundant complexity.

researchvalidation-foundation
Icosa Insights 18 min

Hot Cores and Cold Peripheries: How Center States Drive Personality Dynamics

Not all positions on the grid carry equal weight. This research identifies ‘hot cores’ — centers with high deviation from their balanced target — that disproportionately drive personality dynamics, explaining roughly a third of coherence variance. The centered-to-off-centered spectrum at each position creates a continuous landscape of personality expression, revealing which parts of the self run the show and which quietly hold the background.

researchstates
Icosa Insights 15 min

Measurement Equity and Robustness: Does the Model Work Fairly?

A fair assessment must measure the same constructs the same way for everyone. This research examines measurement equity across demographic conditions, confirming that core structural relationships hold invariant and trap detection shows no group-level bias. Shorter assessment tiers preserve structural fidelity, meaning the model maintains its integrity regardless of who is being assessed or how quickly.

researchvalidation-robustness
Icosa Insights 19 min

Profile Shapes: How 77 Formations Capture Personality Dynamics

When you step back from individual scores, personality profiles reveal recognizable geometric shapes — recurring patterns called formations. This research catalogs 77 distinct formations across four structural dimensions, demonstrating that these shapes emerge naturally from grid geometry rather than arbitrary labeling. Safety screening integrated into formation detection links structural pattern directly to clinical significance.

researchformations
Icosa Insights 18 min

The Architecture of Integration: How Your Coherence Score Actually Works

Coherence measures how well your twenty dimensions work together as an integrated system — and it is the Icosa’s most consequential metric. This research validates a five-layer formula that captures 66% of the variance in personality integration, with gateway flow alone accounting for nearly half. The resulting five-band system separates clinically meaningful groups and provides a single, trackable measure of growth over time.

researchcoherence
Icosa Insights 17 min

The Architecture of the Grid: Why Position Means Everything

The Icosa maps personality across a 4×5 grid of four capacities and five domains, producing twenty distinct dimensions of human experience. This research validates that these twenty positions carry genuine, independent meaning — all 20 centers contribute unique variance, with 19 components needed to reach the 95% PCA threshold. The grid is not an arbitrary arrangement; it is a structurally sound architecture where position, balance, and asymmetry all carry measurable significance.

researchgeometry
Icosa Insights 16 min

The Capacity Paradox: Why Processing Style Doesn't Predict Integration

Open, Focus, Bond, and Move describe four fundamentally different ways of engaging with life — receiving, attending, connecting, and expressing. This research demonstrates that these capacities are independent: knowing how someone opens tells you almost nothing about how they focus. The paradox is that individual capacity levels don’t predict wellbeing — what matters is how evenly each capacity expresses across the five domains.

researchcapacities
Icosa Insights 19 min

The Ground That Shifts: How Oscillation Undermines Change, and What to Stabilize First

Knowing where someone is matters less than knowing where they can move. This research validates that computed centering paths — algorithmically generated sequences of gateway activations — measurably improve coherence when followed in the recommended order. Oscillation emerges as the single strongest predictor of coherence trajectory, making stabilization the critical first step in any growth plan.

researchpaths
Icosa Insights 18 min

The Loop, the Gravity Well, and the Key

Beneath the surface of every personality profile lie structural features that shape lived experience: traps (self-reinforcing feedback loops), basins (system-level attractors pulling toward dysfunction), and gateways (high-leverage points for intervention). This research confirms these three layers are empirically distinct, each measuring a different aspect of personality dynamics. Together they form a diagnostic language connecting geometric structure to the patterns people actually feel.

researchconstructs
Icosa Insights 18 min

The Model That Knows Where It Stops

Can a geometric personality model actually inform clinical practice? This research finds selective but genuine utility — strongest for tracking therapeutic progress, monitoring treatment response, and stratifying risk. Pattern detection provides clinicians with a structural vocabulary that complements traditional diagnostic categories, while the model is transparent about where its evidence is strongest and where clinical judgment must lead.

researchclinical
Icosa Insights 17 min

Two Personalities, One Relationship: The Structural Geometry of Dyadic Interaction

When two people form a relationship, their combined personality geometry creates something structurally new — not just two profiles side by side. This research shows that cross-partner coherence alignment explains 40% of dyadic coherence, while four interaction types capture the qualitative character of how personalities intermesh. The relationship itself has a structural signature that cannot be reduced to either partner alone.

researchdyadic
Icosa Insights 17 min

Under Pressure: Measurement Stability, Edge Cases, and Known Boundaries

A personality model is only useful if it holds up under real-world conditions — varied demographics, imperfect measurement, and edge-case profiles. This research stress-tests the Icosa across age groups, noise levels, and boundary conditions, confirming robust signal preservation and graceful degradation rather than catastrophic failure. The system performs reliably across diverse populations, giving clinicians and individuals confidence in the stability of their results.

researchrobustness

Learn Icosa